Skip to content
OrtivoSign in · My saved prompts

AI prompt library · Strategy & decision-making

Strategy & Decision-Making AI Prompts

Turn a broad decision into a question you can examine. These templates cover pre-mortems, market entry, pricing, resource allocation and strategic trade-offs. Add your objectives, constraints and available evidence, then review the assumptions before acting.

How to use these prompts

  1. Choose a template and open Preview & customise.
  2. Fill the named fields with your details and check the completed draft.
  3. Copy it into your preferred AI tool, or sign in to prepare a Chat draft in Ortivo.

Copying is free and does not call an AI. Generating an answer requires your own configured provider or an available trial. Review important facts and every draft before use.

10 starter prompts in Strategy & decision-making

Strategy & decision-making

Pre-Mortem Failure Analysis

Imagine it is {{timeline}} in the future and our decision to {{decision}} within the context of {{context}} has failed completely. Identify the 5 most plausible root causes of thi…

Suggested: Multi-Model Compare → Decision Notebook
Read template
Imagine it is {{timeline}} in the future and our decision to {{decision}} within the context of {{context}} has failed completely. Identify the 5 most plausible root causes of this failure, rank them by probability and severity, and define the earliest warning signal we would see for each cause.

Use only supplied material or sources actually accessed. Distinguish evidence, estimates and assumptions. Do not invent facts, citations, test results or actions performed. Flag missing information and tool limitations.
Strategy & decision-making

Reversible vs. Irreversible Decision Filter

Evaluate the proposed action: {{proposed_action}}. Given the stakes ({{stakes}}) and estimated cost to undo ({{reversibility_cost}}), classify this as a Type 1 (irreversible) or T…

Suggested: Multi-Model Compare → Decision Notebook
Read template
Evaluate the proposed action: {{proposed_action}}. Given the stakes ({{stakes}}) and estimated cost to undo ({{reversibility_cost}}), classify this as a Type 1 (irreversible) or Type 2 (reversible) decision. Recommend the minimum evidence required before committing and define our decision hinge.

Use only supplied material or sources actually accessed. Distinguish evidence, estimates and assumptions. Do not invent facts, citations, test results or actions performed. Flag missing information and tool limitations.
Strategy & decision-making

Build vs. Buy vs. Partner Matrix

We need to acquire or develop {{capability}} within {{time_horizon}} under a budget of {{budget_range}} and team constraints of {{team_constraints}}. Compare Building in-house, Bu…

Suggested: Multi-Model Compare
Read template
We need to acquire or develop {{capability}} within {{time_horizon}} under a budget of {{budget_range}} and team constraints of {{team_constraints}}. Compare Building in-house, Buying a commercial solution, and Partnering across total cost of ownership, time-to-value, maintenance burden, and strategic lock-in.

Use only supplied material or sources actually accessed. Distinguish evidence, estimates and assumptions. Do not invent facts, citations, test results or actions performed. Flag missing information and tool limitations.
Strategy & decision-making

Market Entry Feasibility Stress-Test

Assess our plan to enter {{target_market}} with {{product_offering}} against incumbents {{incumbents}} using {{capital_available}}. Identify structural barriers to entry, likely i…

Suggested: Multi-Model Compare → AI Council
Read template
Assess our plan to enter {{target_market}} with {{product_offering}} against incumbents {{incumbents}} using {{capital_available}}. Identify structural barriers to entry, likely incumbent retaliation, unit-economics traps, and the smallest viable beachhead segment to test first.

Use only supplied material or sources actually accessed. Distinguish evidence, estimates and assumptions. Do not invent facts, citations, test results or actions performed. Flag missing information and tool limitations.
Strategy & decision-making

Pricing Model & Tier Architecture

Analyze {{product_description}} sold to {{target_buyer}}. Compare our current or proposed pricing ({{current_pricing}}) against value-based, usage-based, and tiered subscription m…

Suggested: Multi-Model Compare
Read template
Analyze {{product_description}} sold to {{target_buyer}}. Compare our current or proposed pricing ({{current_pricing}}) against value-based, usage-based, and tiered subscription models anchored on {{value_metric}}. Recommend a 3-tier structure with clear upgrade triggers and margin protections.

Use only supplied material or sources actually accessed. Distinguish evidence, estimates and assumptions. Do not invent facts, citations, test results or actions performed. Flag missing information and tool limitations.
Strategy & decision-making

OKR Alignment & Metric Audit

Review these proposed OKRs for {{quarter}}: {{proposed_okrs}} against our overarching strategic goal of {{company_goal}}. Flag any key results that are vanity metrics or activity …

Suggested: Single AI + My Brief
Read template
Review these proposed OKRs for {{quarter}}: {{proposed_okrs}} against our overarching strategic goal of {{company_goal}}. Flag any key results that are vanity metrics or activity outputs rather than measurable outcomes, and rewrite them with clear baseline-to-target thresholds.

Use only supplied material or sources actually accessed. Distinguish evidence, estimates and assumptions. Do not invent facts, citations, test results or actions performed. Flag missing information and tool limitations.
Strategy & decision-making

3-Horizon Scenario Planner

Build three distinct 24-month scenarios (Baseline, Bullish, and Adverse) for {{core_business}} operating in {{industry}}, centered on the uncertainty of {{macro_uncertainty}}. For…

Suggested: Multi-Model Compare
Read template
Build three distinct 24-month scenarios (Baseline, Bullish, and Adverse) for {{core_business}} operating in {{industry}}, centered on the uncertainty of {{macro_uncertainty}}. For each scenario, specify leading indicators, no-regret moves, and contingent trigger actions.

Use only supplied material or sources actually accessed. Distinguish evidence, estimates and assumptions. Do not invent facts, citations, test results or actions performed. Flag missing information and tool limitations.
Strategy & decision-making

Capital & Resource Allocation Trade-Off

We must allocate {{available_resources}} across these competing initiatives: {{competing_initiatives}} to maximize {{optimization_goal}}. Evaluate expected return, execution risk,…

Suggested: AI Council
Read template
We must allocate {{available_resources}} across these competing initiatives: {{competing_initiatives}} to maximize {{optimization_goal}}. Evaluate expected return, execution risk, and opportunity cost for each option, and propose a weighted allocation with strict kill criteria.

Use only supplied material or sources actually accessed. Distinguish evidence, estimates and assumptions. Do not invent facts, citations, test results or actions performed. Flag missing information and tool limitations.
Strategy & decision-making

Strategic Pivot vs. Persevere Audit

Given our current traction ({{current_traction}}), burn rate ({{burn_rate}}), and primary bottleneck ({{bottleneck}}), evaluate whether we should persevere with optimization or pi…

Suggested: Multi-Model Compare → Decision Notebook
Read template
Given our current traction ({{current_traction}}), burn rate ({{burn_rate}}), and primary bottleneck ({{bottleneck}}), evaluate whether we should persevere with optimization or pivot toward {{pivot_option}}. Define the smallest 14-day test that would validate or invalidate the pivot.

Use only supplied material or sources actually accessed. Distinguish evidence, estimates and assumptions. Do not invent facts, citations, test results or actions performed. Flag missing information and tool limitations.
Strategy & decision-making

M&A / Strategic Partnership Fit Check

Evaluate the strategic thesis ({{deal_thesis}}) for a partnership or acquisition between {{our_company}} and {{partner_or_target}}. Analyze customer overlap, technical integration…

Suggested: Multi-Model Compare
Read template
Evaluate the strategic thesis ({{deal_thesis}}) for a partnership or acquisition between {{our_company}} and {{partner_or_target}}. Analyze customer overlap, technical integration friction, cultural mismatch risks, and 3 assumptions that must hold true for the deal to create value.

Use only supplied material or sources actually accessed. Distinguish evidence, estimates and assumptions. Do not invent facts, citations, test results or actions performed. Flag missing information and tool limitations.